Darker Net can confirm that officers specialising in infiltration and undercover operations and who liaise with armed units, may already be amongst those policing the Ecuador Embassy in London. A press photographer captured notes (see photo) held by a uniformed police officer on duty outside the embassy, revealing that SS10, otherwise known as Specialist Crime Directorate 10 and formerly SO10, are being deployed. The notes ominously refer to possible “risk of life”. The role of SS10 is Intelligence-gathering. SS10 were involved in the events that led to the murder of Brazilian national, Jean de Menezes, in south London and who had been wrongly identified as a terrorist. SS10 are also the branch that employed Mark Kennedy (aka Stone) who infiltrated several protest groups and who is now working for Densus, a private surveillance company in the USA. Below, we present some more background on these two infamous SS10-led operations.
First… The notes carried by the police officer outside the embassy said that Julian Assange should be taken even if he emerges in a vehicle, under diplomatic immunity or in a diplomatic bag, which may involve “risk to life”. They add that there had been speculation that Mr. Assange could be smuggled out of the building in a parcel or given a post in the United Nations by Ecuador in an attempt to evade arrest. The operational guidance, marked “restricted”, also warned of the “possibility of distraction”, suggesting that Scotland Yard feared Mr Assange’s supporters could try to create a commotion outside the embassy, providing cover under which he could flee. Further details of the notes, which were obscured by the officer holding them, appeared to relate to the “everyday business” of the embassy and the possible need for “additional support” from SS10. Scotland Yard later said it did not know what this referred to. It’s interesting to note, too, S020, the Met’s counter-terrorism protective security command, is written near the bottom right-hand corner of the document.
SS10 ops
1. The killing of Jean Charles de Menezes
In 2005, police from SO10, now SS10, were involved in the surveillance operation of Jean Charles de Menezes, a Brazilian national, that led directly to his murder at Stockwell Underground station by officers of SO19, the Armed response Unit. It was a case of mistaken identity. Two officers from SO19 fired a total of eleven shots, according to the number of empty shell casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range, and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty second period, at three second intervals. It is believed that at least one member of the elite Special Reconnaissance Regiment was present at the shooting. Note: in the resulting inquiry into the murder, Gareth Peirce, who is the lawyer acting for Julian Assange, was one of two lawyers representing the Menezes family. For more, see here.
2. Mark Kennedy
Mark Kennedy worked for SO10 (now SS10) and was involved in several undercover ops, the most celebrated of which involved environmental activists who were opposed to coal-fired power stations. The activists had stopped a train conveying coal to the Drax power station in 2008. Kennedy had infiltrated the group and assisted them with reconnaissance and also drove them to a rendezvous. For more on what happened, see here. See here too for what happened eventually to the activists and how Kennedy and his operations were discredited. Note: Kennedy/Stone is now working for Densus in the USA, which is a surveillance company that spies on Occupy protesters and other protests groups.
Posted from the darker net via Android.
“An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty second period, at three second intervals.” This detail surprised me, as I expected they would fire as quickly as possible. Any idea why the firing pattern?
Posted by lowerarchy | August 26, 2012, 12:23 amOne report suggested that at least one member of the Special Reconnaissance Regiment was on the tube. This kind of gunfire is consistent with army methods.
Posted by anonymous | August 27, 2012, 8:38 amThanks – and thanks for your excellent blog.
Posted by lowerarchy | August 27, 2012, 8:50 amThe Jean Charles De Menezes killing was NOT a case of mistaken identity. The police said they killed him because they believed he had an explosive device. The police had followed him all the way from his house. They had watched him get on a bus, get off, and go into the tube station. Why would they let a man with explosives get on a bus? The police said that he ran and jumped over the barrier when asked to stop. At first, the Israeli security company who operate the London Underground CCTV said that the CCTV was not working that day (as happened with the same company on 7/7 a couple of weeks earlier). They later admitted that it did exist, and it showed Menezes walking calmly, NOT running, NOT jumping, and NOT wearing anything that could be mistaken for an explosive device. Menezes was killed because he knew something. What did he know? Well. Menezes was a contract electrician. We were told this in the news. We were told many many things about Jean Charles De Menezes, but never where he worked. Just prior to the 7/7 attacks, there was work being done at and near the stations that were effected, including electrical work. I’m not going to lay out all the evidence for 7/7 being a false flag attack here, because its available elsewhere, but that is what my Jean Charles De Menezes theory is based around. That he was working on the tube when the devices were being put in place, that he saw something, that after the 7/7 attacks he realised what had happened, and that he was probably starting to talk. That was why he was killed. No mistaken identity, they knew exactly who he was.
Posted by Joe | August 27, 2012, 1:09 amThe inquest, of course, looked at the blunders of the police, little else. The police stated that they had intelligence that four suspected terrorists were in the block of flats where de Menezes was living, yet their identities were never subsequently sought, which is very odd. There are still a lot of unanswered questions relating to the case, though if your theory is correct getting the evidence to prove it might be impossible.
Posted by anonymous | August 27, 2012, 8:45 amThis is literally the ONLY place I have seen those photos. You are to be congratulated for getting this out there and into the news.
Posted by raincoaster | August 27, 2012, 5:29 pmNot the only place, but possibly the first to explain in depth the explanation about SS10 etc.
Posted by anonymous | August 27, 2012, 7:00 pmI know everyone loves a good conspiracy, but have you considered that the SS10 is actually 5510, which would be the number of a Police serial, and not some undercover organisation? Feel free to look in the front of a Police riot van next time you see one.
Posted by Captain Obvious is Obvious. | August 28, 2012, 1:11 pmI suspect SS10 is just a mis-spelling and the officer meant SO10
Posted by anonymous | August 28, 2012, 7:50 pmIts not SO10, its 5510. When you’re next down there, look at the little signs in the Police vans.
Posted by Captain Obvious is Obvious. | August 28, 2012, 10:57 pm